Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65034 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 27247 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2013 21:47:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jan 2013 21:47:13 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 92.254.50.218 unknown Received: from [92.254.50.218] ([92.254.50.218:8963] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E0/01-14707-BD2C9F05 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:47:07 -0500 To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 22:47:05 +0100 Message-ID: <71gjf819lv1h8010sqgnauureak9catlnb@4ax.com> References: X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 92.254.50.218 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] is GD being actively maintained? From: phpdev@ehrhardt.nl (Jan Ehrhardt) Pierre Joye in php.internals (Thu, 6 Sep 2012 18:43:01 +0200): >On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Rasmus Schultz wrote: >> I opened this bug report 2 years ago: >> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52756 Hmmm. I see it is still open. >> Is GD still actively maintained? > >yes. Slowly but yes, we will finally merge 2.1 in 5.5 too. Related, but no real bug: libjpeg 9.0 is released. It compiles fine into php_gd2.dll, but reports an unknown version. This is due to ext/gd/libgd/gd_jpeg.c, which only knows versions 6b, 7 and 8. A simple check for JPEG_LIB_VERSION == 90 would be enough for the moment, but wouldn't it be better to report the JPEG_LIB_VERSION it self? 62, 70, 80, 90 or whatever... Jan