Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64995 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 82976 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2013 18:48:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Jan 2013 18:48:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dclarke@blastwave.org; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dclarke@blastwave.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain blastwave.org from 210.87.62.131 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dclarke@blastwave.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 210.87.62.131 comm.purplecow.org Solaris 10 (beta) Received: from [210.87.62.131] ([210.87.62.131:36407] helo=comm.purplecow.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F9/80-14541-2F5F6F05 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:48:19 -0500 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from comm.purplecow.org ([127.0.0.1]) by comm.purplecow.org (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-6.03 (built Mar 14 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0MGQ00IFGEWE7J10@comm.purplecow.org> for internals@lists.php.net; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 05:48:14 +1100 (EST) Received: from comm.purplecow.org ([127.0.0.1] helo=comm.purplecow.org) with IPv4:25 by ASSP.nospam; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 05:48:14 +1100 Received: from [66.103.52.207] by comm.purplecow.org (mshttpd); Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:48:14 -0500 To: Christopher Jones Cc: internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:48:14 -0500 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.3-6.03 (built Mar 14 2008; 32bit) Content-language: en X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal In-reply-to: <50F61E53.7030409@oracle.com> References: <50F4CE6B.5060809@oracle.com> <50F61E53.7030409@oracle.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4.10 can not build Zend/PHP parsers with bison 2.6.5 From: dclarke@blastwave.org (Dennis Clarke) > On 01/15/2013 12:09 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > >> Of course, if 2.6.5 is verified than it should be added to > >> bison_version_list in Zend/acinclude.m4. Feel free to regenerate the > >> parsers with it, review the test suite results, and create a github > >> pull request. > > > > Anything outside of "release tarball" won't be supported here. Sorry. > > However ... having said that, it is certainly worth the attempt. > > > > Question for you, ever seen PHP build on Solaris 10 with mysql > >( in /opt/mysql as per MySQL Release Engineering packages ) and > >have it pass its own testsuite? > > I rarely build on Solaris. Other messages in this thread mention how > you can assist the PHP community in resolving any issues you do see. I see. Well I am not new to this and knew that there would be issues. The general modus operandi of most people is to ditch the problem OS and switch over to Red Hat or maybe SUSE but the software investment here is too great. The switch over would be long and costly etc etc etc. Also, there are financial institutions that still love their UNIX servers ( Solaris ) and are unlikely to let go anytime soon. Maybe you could have a word with the executive board at Oracle and get them to stop making newer bigger Sparc servers and exadata storage? ;-) > Are you building a specific PHP version for a reason? Can you use the > pre-built Solaris PHP packages in some situations (e.g. see the > Solaris chapter in > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/php/underground-php-oracle-manual-098250.html) I was not aware that Oracle had pre-built PHP packages. I can only assume that they would install with typical SVR4 packages into Solaris 10 and then be subject to maintenance under a typical MOS contract? If not, then I am stuck doing the port work myself. As for the version, well, the production release version seems like a good way to go. That seems to be PHP 5.4.10 at the moment and unless someone says that it is bleeding edge beta grade ... it makes sense to compile it. I am going to go check out your link there and, perhaps, stay in touch. from what I gather by reading between the lines no one is in a hurry at Oracle to do anything on Solaris either. At least, seems that way. Dennis