Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64960 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 68479 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2013 22:55:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jan 2013 22:55:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain nebm.ist.utl.pt from 193.136.128.22 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt X-Host-Fingerprint: 193.136.128.22 smtp2.ist.utl.pt Linux 2.6 Received: from [193.136.128.22] ([193.136.128.22:43367] helo=smtp2.ist.utl.pt) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 63/ED-22727-BCC84F05 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:55:08 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.ist.utl.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF6A700097B; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:55:04 +0000 (WET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.6.4 (20090625) (Debian) at ist.utl.pt Received: from smtp2.ist.utl.pt ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.ist.utl.pt [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with LMTP id De8syHx871ER; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:55:04 +0000 (WET) Received: from mail2.ist.utl.pt (mail.ist.utl.pt [IPv6:2001:690:2100:1::8]) by smtp2.ist.utl.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8AA7000444; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:55:04 +0000 (WET) Received: from damnation.nl.lo.geleia.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:94a2:4:21d:baff:feee:cc0b]) (Authenticated sender: ist155741) by mail2.ist.utl.pt (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D9D42002E10; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:55:02 +0000 (WET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Lars Strojny" Cc: "Ben Ramsey" , "Pierre Joye" , "PHP internals" References: <50F4802C.5070003@php.net> <9D8B9378-08F1-44AE-943B-E865104F2F0B@strojny.net> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:54:59 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: =?utf-8?Q?N=C3=BAcleo_de_Eng=2E_Biom=C3=A9di?= =?utf-8?Q?ca_do_I=2ES=2ET=2E?= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <9D8B9378-08F1-44AE-943B-E865104F2F0B@strojny.net> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.11 (Linux) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] array_column() function From: glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt ("Gustavo Lopes") On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:43:31 +0100, Lars Strojny wrote: > - Do you want to include the functionality: yes/no > - If you want to include it, which name should it have: > array_column/array_pluck ? You said earlier: > I was one of the people changing from yes to no because > of the name. I like the functionality but I prefer no > new array function over one with yet another strange name. You realize you cannot express this choice under the setup you proposed right? That is why processes that include a general vote followed by amendments or other detail decisions (like you propose) usually include a final global vote at the end. -- Gustavo Lopes