Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64959 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 66621 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2013 22:43:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jan 2013 22:43:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lars@strojny.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lars@strojny.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain strojny.net from 46.4.40.248 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lars@strojny.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 46.4.40.248 milch.schokokeks.org Received: from [46.4.40.248] ([46.4.40.248:36012] helo=milch.schokokeks.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 8C/8D-22727-71A84F05 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:43:37 -0500 Received: from lstrojnypro3.fritz.box (ppp-46-244-142-98.dynamic.mnet-online.de [::ffff:46.244.142.98]) (AUTH: PLAIN lars@schokokeks.org, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by milch.schokokeks.org with ESMTPSA; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:43:31 +0100 id 000000000000001A.0000000050F48A13.000010F1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:43:31 +0100 Cc: "Ben Ramsey" , "Pierre Joye" , "PHP internals" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <9D8B9378-08F1-44AE-943B-E865104F2F0B@strojny.net> References: <50F4802C.5070003@php.net> To: Gustavo Lopes X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] array_column() function From: lars@strojny.net (Lars Strojny) It=92s quite simple:=20 - Do you want to include the functionality: yes/no - If you want to include it, which name should it have: = array_column/array_pluck Am 14.01.2013 um 23:23 schrieb Gustavo Lopes : > On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:16:52 +0100, Pierre Joye = wrote: >=20 >> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Ben Ramsey wrote: >>=20 >>> I've already removed the array_pluck() alias. Unfortunately, after = removing the alias, it appears that some have changed their votes from = "yes" to "no," because they preferred the other function name. >>>=20 >>> That said, I'm not going to call for a vote on the function name at = this >>> time. The predominant sentiment on the list was for it to have one = function name or the other, but not both, so I've updated the pull = request >>> accordingly. >>=20 >> Up to you, but I'd to suggest again to re do the vote and add the >> naming option, easy, clear, open. >>=20 >=20 > I don't think either easier or clear. Then all sort of questions come = up if none of the three options has an absolute majority. And if you = open two separate and concurrent votes you're taking from people the = power to condition the vote on a specific choice of name. >=20 > Personally, I don't care about the name as long as only one is chosen = (no alias). >=20 > --=20 > Gustavo Lopes >=20 > --=20 > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >=20