Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64958 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 64522 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2013 22:23:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jan 2013 22:23:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain nebm.ist.utl.pt from 193.136.128.22 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt X-Host-Fingerprint: 193.136.128.22 smtp2.ist.utl.pt Linux 2.6 Received: from [193.136.128.22] ([193.136.128.22:48132] helo=smtp2.ist.utl.pt) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 3F/2D-22727-A6584F05 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:23:38 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.ist.utl.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FCB87000498; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:23:35 +0000 (WET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.6.4 (20090625) (Debian) at ist.utl.pt Received: from smtp2.ist.utl.pt ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.ist.utl.pt [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with LMTP id ouS+-8Eh5m5l; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:23:35 +0000 (WET) Received: from mail2.ist.utl.pt (mail.ist.utl.pt [IPv6:2001:690:2100:1::8]) by smtp2.ist.utl.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159E870003F0; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:23:35 +0000 (WET) Received: from damnation.nl.lo.geleia.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:94a2:4:21d:baff:feee:cc0b]) (Authenticated sender: ist155741) by mail2.ist.utl.pt (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE6D52008495; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:23:33 +0000 (WET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: "Ben Ramsey" , "Pierre Joye" Cc: "PHP internals" References: <50F4802C.5070003@php.net> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:23:30 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: =?utf-8?Q?N=C3=BAcleo_de_Eng=2E_Biom=C3=A9di?= =?utf-8?Q?ca_do_I=2ES=2ET=2E?= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.11 (Linux) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] array_column() function From: glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt ("Gustavo Lopes") On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:16:52 +0100, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Ben Ramsey wrote: > >> I've already removed the array_pluck() alias. Unfortunately, after >> removing the alias, it appears that some have changed their votes from >> "yes" to "no," because they preferred the other function name. >> >> That said, I'm not going to call for a vote on the function name at this >> time. The predominant sentiment on the list was for it to have one >> function name or the other, but not both, so I've updated the pull >> request >> accordingly. > > Up to you, but I'd to suggest again to re do the vote and add the > naming option, easy, clear, open. > I don't think either easier or clear. Then all sort of questions come up if none of the three options has an absolute majority. And if you open two separate and concurrent votes you're taking from people the power to condition the vote on a specific choice of name. Personally, I don't care about the name as long as only one is chosen (no alias). -- Gustavo Lopes