Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64956
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.53 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <50F4802C.5070003@php.net>
References: <B5.40.02940.19BA0F05@pb1.pair.com>
	<CAEZPtU6htieXw8D7U4DS-T3c-BqOGLk4D+Tta43FzR5YC8997Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<50F4802C.5070003@php.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:16:52 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU7WjOU6t-Cw4CTTTVLz_iHcKxKcF+OXMzxGw67opEPXMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Ramsey <ramsey@php.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] array_column() function
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Ben Ramsey <ramsey@php.net> wrote:

> I've already removed the array_pluck() alias. Unfortunately, after removing
> the alias, it appears that some have changed their votes from "yes" to "no,"
> because they preferred the other function name.
>
> That said, I'm not going to call for a vote on the function name at this
> time. The predominant sentiment on the list was for it to have one function
> name or the other, but not both, so I've updated the pull request
> accordingly.

Up to you, but I'd to suggest again to re do the vote and add the
naming option, easy, clear, open.

Cheers,
--
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org