Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64955 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 59871 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2013 22:01:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jan 2013 22:01:21 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.2.187.194 w194.z064002187.mco-fl.dsl.cnc.net Received: from [64.2.187.194] ([64.2.187.194:5174] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1D/2C-22727-03084F05 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:01:20 -0500 To: internals@lists.php.net,Pierre Joye Message-ID: <50F4802C.5070003@php.net> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:01:16 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 64.2.187.194 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] array_column() function From: ramsey@php.net (Ben Ramsey) On 1/14/13 3:49 PM, Pierre Joye wrote: > hi! > > Btw, really willing to have this function but I agree with other here, > the alias must go. It makes no sense to introduce a function and an > alias to it at the same time. > > Maybe restart the vote and let choose function name. > > Options: > 1. array_column > 2. array_pluck > 3. none of them > > Thanks for your work! I've already removed the array_pluck() alias. Unfortunately, after removing the alias, it appears that some have changed their votes from "yes" to "no," because they preferred the other function name. That said, I'm not going to call for a vote on the function name at this time. The predominant sentiment on the list was for it to have one function name or the other, but not both, so I've updated the pull request accordingly. -Ben