Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64946
Return-Path: <ircmaxell@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 39644 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2013 19:51:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jan 2013 19:51:46 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ircmaxell@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ircmaxell@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.180 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ircmaxell@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.180 mail-vc0-f180.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.220.180] ([209.85.220.180:42547] helo=mail-vc0-f180.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 9E/38-22727-1D164F05 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:51:45 -0500
Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id p16so3959980vcq.11
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:51:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=ddlC5Qzr2g22K+LVFWwyg+jyfttPNt1idek0Je+B1z0=;
        b=l7M0T33GH5FRWeL+9PWKMcBhR8b5NT7CiV9zfDDvE6NYIzKTVuu5N+eJJkVv35973x
         aPSao7VS1FyQbZKdTXCKaoB9v65MRPlBFu8y21sSBQ/FIivjxLLNe107JEuUG74RRFQo
         qvpU+zkQqa3F2m1utW7ko2MiH90eC5dsDvGcvZU43t3wxyXmBHi8xbhg2Zm8wZ5f5NAc
         geV6lSPVPuWb4OJkecFCUtoMEtzSqlsklgHADRO/IJ2toQ24xHGF8mG8tLuLqzte5oLF
         Tq9InrUCyVZ4rwm9FsN8kjC56v3gUY4/Qj4dA+WRukWJjUSoJd/RfgE7jIUo8mVAMgl1
         PLKA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.31.197 with SMTP id c5mr90011757vdi.65.1358193102754; Mon,
 14 Jan 2013 11:51:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.173.4 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:51:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAEbg-4b=t+H63NwcK=6vCNhKUET7FmzmFkFXdEKCgYGfUo7Xxw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEbg-4Z+iUyaVjbQBVkB3RLzF8CAHBq+qA29AXJFt+Kw_pGn5A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALtuQzAi27mF2-5JzFixbOcM6GBK7fp2Z0FWVd-kSBewz=Z+ZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEbg-4b=t+H63NwcK=6vCNhKUET7FmzmFkFXdEKCgYGfUo7Xxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:51:42 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAyV7nFiiD8ZmegaB2vGWwGz9kgauEuSpU6W-rTVE5Fsjq++uQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexander Lissachenko <lisachenko.it@gmail.com>
Cc: Sebastian Krebs <krebs.seb@gmail.com>, PHP internals list <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec517c5486d132e04d344f917
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [Reflection] Improve logic of ReflectionMethod->invokeArgs()
 for static methods
From: ircmaxell@gmail.com (Anthony Ferrara)

--bcaec517c5486d132e04d344f917
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Alexander,

So, I take the original class, rename it and then create a decorator
> class instead of original class with overridden dynamic and static
> methods. Method in the decorator should make some specific logic and
> then just invokes the original static method with Reflection, but the
> scope should be also correct.
>

I have to ask: *why*? Why are you using static methods like that? It seems
to me that you're trying to use LSB to introduce a form of polymorphism
where it's not really designed for it... Why not just use instances in this
case (which are supported for your use-case)...?

Anthony

--bcaec517c5486d132e04d344f917--