Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64872
Return-Path: <mjpelmear@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 78661 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2013 00:36:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jan 2013 00:36:18 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mjpelmear@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mjpelmear@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.49 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mjpelmear@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.49 mail-pb0-f49.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.160.49] ([209.85.160.49:37943] helo=mail-pb0-f49.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id F1/11-02940-200B0F05 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 19:36:18 -0500
Received: by mail-pb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id un15so1221856pbc.22
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:36:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=/eR2fhdaLYI/Q3D8UDNjgYON2QxflBcYspUVNrarR8E=;
        b=NxyXkQ8R0hw+gVU1eQnxfN5n0UJLEerFMN0IHIraEU158LnSJENLf+omwnT6HTSYea
         JAhwV0dp5Rbg+RjK8w9HdgqgDJnVFo0JhPA4m+rRMW/x0iMWiLbYJVQhFft7P+2Gjtug
         86yHAJFixbEIoUX4j+p3KhQZVO50M+7PqPleZHcbjy0yGNanZsoL+NxDvBpZ2bLIiH7g
         iGSmUZ0Oar0ANYEduPCadayOWls0o0BXCKHBcPd5wbessjRBCvvj4GS1tTpMnDW+pxYY
         i9AMpcZbIOmlh6TRGzsUqKMHvaLJDOhdL1kjtl8rA7qIxhvtIJGxop5uL7d0zQ90SwRa
         gC1Q==
X-Received: by 10.68.203.132 with SMTP id kq4mr230961403pbc.3.1357950975642;
        Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:36:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.123] (cpe-98-154-250-197.socal.res.rr.com. [98.154.250.197])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wh8sm3607804pbc.75.2013.01.11.16.36.13
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:36:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50F0AFFC.6060607@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:36:12 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <B5.40.02940.19BA0F05@pb1.pair.com>
In-Reply-To: <B5.40.02940.19BA0F05@pb1.pair.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] array_column() function
From: mjpelmear@gmail.com (Matt Pelmear)

On 01/11/2013 04:17 PM, Ben Ramsey wrote:
> I've opened voting for the array_column() function RFC.
>
> You can vote at https://wiki.php.net/rfc/array_column#voting
>
> Regards,
> Ben
>

+1

I can't vote, but I support this RFC.

This is much, much simpler to use and easier to implement than most 
other things I've been watching here recently (annotations, list 
comprehensions), and I work with multiple teams that would definitely 
benefit from this on a regular basis.

That said, I hate function aliases. Can't we have one or the other here, 
not both? (array_column() vs array_pluck())

-Matt