Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64769 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 63875 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2013 17:27:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Jan 2013 17:27:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.133 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.133 smtp133.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.133] ([67.192.241.133:45072] helo=smtp133.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1D/92-02684-678ADE05 for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 12:27:18 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp13.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 097863D076D; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:27:16 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp13.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id A88493D06C8; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:27:15 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <50EDA873.1070505@sugarcrm.com> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 09:27:15 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derick Rethans CC: Anthony Ferrara , Rasmus Lerdorf , "internals@lists.php.net" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Was Reflection annotations reader - Pull APC in Core Already From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > It was a plan in the past, I think we should just do it - now. If you mean moving the directory from pecl to ext/ - that's fine as long as maintainers commit to keeping it in shape (last time, I remember, 5.4 support was lagging). If you mean more tight integration - see my previous email why I think it would be a bad idea. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227