Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64745
Return-Path: <morrison.levi@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 24166 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2013 15:15:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 9 Jan 2013 15:15:20 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=morrison.levi@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=morrison.levi@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.219.49 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.219.49 mail-oa0-f49.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.219.49] ([209.85.219.49:50997] helo=mail-oa0-f49.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id A0/4A-02684-6898DE05 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 10:15:19 -0500
Received: by mail-oa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id l10so1111140oag.36
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 07:15:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=IT92YJVoTALGFBKeuyE+/U2bNvZV/+07IiIA5T84TvE=;
        b=TR24Gq/Ad1myi9q3Ad3CBwBNe7A/tF7FDqrl2tU8+7GnjmUHaZ2vLLtDVdZCO4qO7Q
         8Y43KAJjy8eSpxJJZleUt//OiSRjwh7SndM50B8W2nfRTEiHamFFmHqhdCLUZYRtCK2v
         ayS4jg62fRh5zAlkvjVbVvWwIEVC2YZJ5I79l1WvUj70EiXhj51c26TqZL9d2P2P2bwR
         VgqWktBEOnU4DagSJkCBomjuoj4NX4z6ZUjTnXRgan0kGU3Zptf4XPghnNPRPwMPSe9V
         mE0hGDtpNulOjmpmU8AZut7fNRTbh/KAB2i3y4aickIgIpm7RmhqyxBVwfku4i9WOea2
         ybJA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.27.166 with SMTP id u6mr37995198oeg.80.1357744516424; Wed,
 09 Jan 2013 07:15:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.82.234 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 07:15:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <50ED4C18.3090806@zerocue.com>
References: <50ED4C18.3090806@zerocue.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 08:15:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFMT4NpvrCH1qhxcRXQpmgbTe7Tk7nBgj1ACeTjGfO6azD98gw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Clint Priest <cpriest@zerocue.com>
Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] - True Annotations
From: morrison.levi@gmail.com (Levi Morrison)

> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/annotations

Perhaps I am blind, but I do not see where in the RFC is defends its
choice to use `<>`. Every other language I know of uses `@`, and I do
not know of technical reasons why we couldn't use the same symbol.
Annotations wouldn't be able to contain expressions so there wouldn't
be anything that could generate a suppressible error.