Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64697 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 69983 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2013 18:29:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Jan 2013 18:29:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 173.203.6.131 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 173.203.6.131 smtp131.ord.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [173.203.6.131] ([173.203.6.131:57476] helo=smtp131.ord.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EC/B0-16636-D656CE05 for ; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 13:29:02 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp21.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3A363300166; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 13:28:59 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp21.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 1FDB8300571; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 13:28:58 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <50EC6569.6030202@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 10:28:57 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierrick Charron CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <50EBDEEE.8070605@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Reflection annotations reader From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > I agree, there is a need in this functionality, but all those userland > implementations were at the first place made because this > functionality was not part of the language. I think docblocks is not > the solution, doc blocks are just comments, and I would expect any > code to work the same way if I remove my comments. So you never used PHPUnit and never will in the future, right? Maybe so, but thousands of other people do, and have no problem with directives in the comments. I think it is time to lay this red herring to rest - nobody who had any encounter with any of the most popular PHP tools really expects it. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227