Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64672
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: fail (pb1.pair.com: domain rafaeldohms.com.br does not designate 209.85.212.53 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEZPtU6m32XiOsW7BDxCHqM0DPFRwAOKLeaJqCt1WwRG6p2Zww@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANVTSm5XE69i=KkZV621+tmwWbSKnsHECN0UsLin7mdBTc+jOg@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1301080956560.28951@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl>
	<CAEZPtU6m32XiOsW7BDxCHqM0DPFRwAOKLeaJqCt1WwRG6p2Zww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 11:26:15 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOhuFva6Yu5z8YWctdE4Q3wK4+Ujhbh16aOmV=hecUM7Pk1u5g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Cc: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>, Yahav Gindi Bar <g.b.yahav@gmail.com>, 
	PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51d2102289b3204d2c46012
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Reflection annotations reader
From: listas@rafaeldohms.com.br (Rafael Dohms)

--bcaec51d2102289b3204d2c46012
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
>
> > This belongs in an extension, just like last time we've discussed
> > annotations.
>
> Last time we discussed this area, we discussed almost everything about
> docblock and the likes but actual annotation. However I do not get
> your reasoning, annotations are part of languages features, how could
> it fit in an extension? That makes no sense.
>
> I also agree it is core due to its nature.
But also, given the large amount of frameworks that support the use of
annotations and the nature of
hosting providers and extensions, I really think this is a core feature.

-- 
Rafael Dohms
PHP Evangelist and Community Leader
http://doh.ms
http://wwwamsterdamphp.nl

--bcaec51d2102289b3204d2c46012--