Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64611
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain strojny.net from 46.4.40.248 cause and error)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
In-Reply-To: <CANVTSm5XE69i=KkZV621+tmwWbSKnsHECN0UsLin7mdBTc+jOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 23:24:45 +0100
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <45FD2112-5469-48A2-8941-92415EC711E1@strojny.net>
References: <CANVTSm5XE69i=KkZV621+tmwWbSKnsHECN0UsLin7mdBTc+jOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yahav Gindi Bar <g.b.yahav@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Reflection annotations reader
From: lars@strojny.net (Lars Strojny)

Hi Yahav,

Am 06.01.2013 um 22:58 schrieb Yahav Gindi Bar <g.b.yahav@gmail.com>:
[...]
> In one of the discussions (about the "deprecated" keyword, to be =
specific),
> it was been said that adding ability to read doc-comment annotation =
could
> be handy. Personally, I really think it can be great.
>=20
> So, I've created an RFC that propose to improve the Reflection =
extension by
> adding the ability to read annotations decorated in the doc-comment.
>=20
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reflection_doccomment_annotations
>=20
> What is your opinion about this?


=46rom what I've seen in various components using annotations, this kind =
of support wouldn=92t be enough. I would much prefer direct mapping of a =
single annotation on a class including a way to define properties and =
such. This is how e.g. Doctrine, Symfony, Zend Framework etc. all =
utilize annotations nowadays.

cu,
Lars=