Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64353
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com does not designate 209.85.214.173 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <50D0DF5A.5030003@sugarcrm.com>
References: <CA+9eiLvck3pye3HDTuxSZoYJqm=Ycc_=fXfpVsPjZb=xD7CfzA@mail.gmail.com>
	<50D0DF5A.5030003@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:45:38 +0300
Message-ID: <CA+9eiLtLKv9NjKTyMAnwXY7i5yGgnxYiJNkb6t78M3cinGdjKg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044470af60120b04d12ef612
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Complete traits redesign for 5.5
From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov)

--f46d044470af60120b04d12ef612
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Stas,

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>wrote:

> Hi!
>
> > I'm going to take a deep look into trait implementation and provide a
> > better solution for 5.5.
> > The current implementation is really wired and makes a lot of troubles
> for
> > maintenance and each new fix, makes new troubles :(
> > I'm really sorry, I didn't pay enough attention to treats before 5.4
> > release :(
> >
> > The new solution may significantly change implementation and even
> behavior
> > in some cases (e.g https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=62069).
>
> Thanks for looking into it! Could you write some description of what
> functionality changes are needed and why? An RFC would be helpful, so we
> have a definite reference and instead of going through all bug comments
> and risking missing something.
>

For now I don't know exactly, what is going to be changed, but it must be
mainly implementation.
I'll try to summarize the required changes, when I know myself.


> BTW, could you after that take a look at bug #63462? It's kind of weird,
> and part of it with protected seems to be a bug (same property name is
> used both mangled and unmangled when using guards) but I'm not sure yet
> what to do with it. I may have time to look into it on the weekend, but
> would appreciate second opinion.
>

Sure. Assigned to myself.

Thanks. Dmitry.


> Thanks,
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
> (408)454-6900 ext. 227
>

--f46d044470af60120b04d12ef612--