Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64293 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 42145 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2012 11:42:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Dec 2012 11:42:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lars@strojny.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lars@strojny.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain strojny.net from 46.4.40.248 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lars@strojny.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 46.4.40.248 milch.schokokeks.org Received: from [46.4.40.248] ([46.4.40.248:36257] helo=milch.schokokeks.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E3/94-27715-DA3BDC05 for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 06:42:38 -0500 Received: from [192.168.178.32] (ppp-88-217-76-237.dynamic.mnet-online.de [::ffff:88.217.76.237]) (AUTH: PLAIN lars@schokokeks.org, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by milch.schokokeks.org with ESMTPSA; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:42:34 +0100 id 0000000000000027.0000000050CDB3AA.00003809 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:42:33 +0100 Cc: PHP internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <813193D8-4278-4C52-A5E6-9E26300D4DBC@strojny.net> References: To: Kris Craig X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Core liason for PHP FIG From: lars@strojny.net (Lars Strojny) Hi Kris, thanks for your response. Just a short note: I'm not in any ways = officially related to PHP FIG, except that I find it personally to be a = good initiative. Rest of the answers below. Am 16.12.2012 um 11:50 schrieb Kris Craig : > My one concern with this idea is that it could give the erroneous = impression that the coding style standards your group advocates are = endorsed, implicitly or otherwise, by the PHP Group. There is no = "official" standard when it comes to spaces vs. tabs and whether to = place brackets on the same line, for example. Given how many different = competing standards there are out there, I fear that we could run the = risk of showing favoritism by "legitimizing" one standards group but not = others. I see what you mean. On the other hand though, a majority of important = PHP projects are organized there. We (as core developers) can=92t ignore = what these projects are discussing and I don't think we should. And if = we have a saying in that, why shouldn=92t we endorse such an initiative. > Personally, and I'm just speaking for myself here, I think you guys = over-reached with your PSR-2 style guidelines. I totally agree with = your goal of aiding consistency, but these standards are inherently = arbitrary and it makes me very uneasy to see anyone proclaim that = such-and-such is the "correct" style of doing something in PHP. The = only solution I can see is to create several different style rulesets to = reflect all the noteworthy styles in popular use. Of course, then you = run the risk of undermining the whole consistency goal. I, again, can=92t speak for PHP FIG, but it seems to me like the survey = technique worked out pretty well. So PSR-1 and PSR-2 are what most = projects are doing anyway. > I wouldn't be adverse to us linking to your project, so long as we do = the same for any others that crop-up and we make it clear that these = third-party standards are not officially endorsed by the PHP Group. I = also think it's cool if anyone here wants to join your project and = contribute, so long as that person is representing him/her self. See point above. We can=92t ignore what major players in the ecosystem = do and I don't think we should. I would much rather see PHP core have a = saying in their decisions than standing by the lines and letting things = happen (which might even be counter-productive for core). cu, Lars=