Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64236 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 13591 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2012 20:10:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Dec 2012 20:10:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=florian@anderiasch.de; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=florian@anderiasch.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain anderiasch.de from 81.169.138.148 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: florian@anderiasch.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.138.148 ares.art-core.org Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [81.169.138.148] ([81.169.138.148:52172] helo=mail.anderiasch.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CF/E8-60401-FB146C05 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:10:40 -0500 Message-ID: <50C641B9.1030402@anderiasch.de> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 21:10:33 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9oYW5uZXMgU2NobMO8dGVy?= CC: Adam Harvey , PHP internals list References: <1355137083.3178.24.camel@guybrush> <1355143879.3178.37.camel@guybrush> <1355149483.3178.44.camel@guybrush> In-Reply-To: <1355149483.3178.44.camel@guybrush> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3 - end of live schedule From: florian@anderiasch.de (Florian Anderiasch) On 10.12.2012 15:24, Johannes Schlüter wrote: > On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 21:08 +0800, Adam Harvey wrote: >> To be honest, Debian isn't really the distribution I'm worried about. >> Ondřej does good work, and Debian Wheezy has PHP 5.4 and isn't miles >> off, it seems. >> >> RHEL and Ubuntu are mostly the ones I'm thinking of here — RHEL 7 is >> supposed to be out in the second half of next year, but history (and >> my own experience both in supporting users and dealing with vendors) >> suggests that RHEL users are slow to upgrade. Ubuntu won't have >> another LTS release until 2014. > > All those are interested in are "critical"/"security" fixes. Besides > that the version is frozen. So for those I don't see a benefit to > continue providing unrelated fixes. Yes, with RHEL 6.3 using 5.3.3 I don't see how doing anything besides going into "bugfix mode" is going to benefit those users, or is there a 6.4 planned? Greetings, Florian