Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64191
Return-Path: <adam@adamharvey.name>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 88802 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2012 06:19:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 7 Dec 2012 06:19:31 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=adam@adamharvey.name; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=adam@adamharvey.name; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain adamharvey.name designates 209.85.219.42 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: adam@adamharvey.name
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.219.42 mail-oa0-f42.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.219.42] ([209.85.219.42:53275] helo=mail-oa0-f42.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 5E/60-14797-07A81C05 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 01:19:29 -0500
Received: by mail-oa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id j1so135008oag.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:19:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=adamharvey.name; s=google;
        h=mime-version:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id
         :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=2jdChI2COIyrgTw0LuyB5lmQLMM1vBHri2S+YZGIoKI=;
        b=VWOw/UoK0tTzDQnrZ4LUR675RjoKZuQHISF+0qC+G/LnmSOM+UdF50Yz7j2IsiytNI
         wtxVLN2SUtPm7PNNFYXm0kjHevjSlcc+efjvTPIBmcluGq+kr27ZznPrW9ys9FTVX9cQ
         bvZaRW0oVkrhG0ZMtsb76eUcodd9xAZOBra3s=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id
         :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
         :x-gm-message-state;
        bh=2jdChI2COIyrgTw0LuyB5lmQLMM1vBHri2S+YZGIoKI=;
        b=YuDAM/81BsgtH7a8DhpCKP3/CEW4n5sj1D6XMy4Le6DrPB3/Aaw3qykKY4LOVW3R55
         AcY5TFBTNmy6xXT4t3YTTbscDO30HosJIJ2yyhwM+HLqYu9MFmB0HxIN6Rgqk9h+65yr
         8ymP1g1CXpTtc9H2yRh5wY7xFsL7ir/GudN/VKscKw23E1umklsyFjozsGY4g+OJZPuG
         O9vxygLzuEVruIXWDG/WrdBOTVyVh7ZDf8tiC984f3212eUoG42fimvkS30UaxrTEkGN
         R7LTCb1Pwo0CErTdEn65zRGhDi39vPIz8CJda2xP2a5k9D39m26JY3uD+zU5/0qEOcwI
         PkYQ==
Received: by 10.60.3.168 with SMTP id d8mr2675903oed.112.1354861166217; Thu,
 06 Dec 2012 22:19:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: adam@adamharvey.name
Received: by 10.76.153.133 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 22:19:06 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 14:19:06 +0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: J-ohY2Q3am_wxeVuKiQqR2_4lvw
Message-ID: <CADajX4AB-P+z8qM84cXG6hUfuYjNDv3LAEYo5WGxNAd0t7bGvw@mail.gmail.com>
To: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkrQ+HkNlht7vUKKz9d9x7FUPS004vUnsIrgh+1EaFovJSjp0bWQNXLNNasr/vqfQ6Lr8z0
Subject: [VOTE RESULT] ext/mysql deprecation in 5.5
From: aharvey@php.net (Adam Harvey)

All,

I ended up leaving the vote open for a couple of extra days (been a
busy week), but I've now closed the ext/mysql deprecation vote. The
full results are at https://wiki.php.net/rfc/mysql_deprecation =E2=80=94 th=
e
short version is that the final vote was 25-12 in favour of
deprecation in PHP 5.5.

This made the second question moot, but for the record, the result
there was 26-12 in favour of option (a) (deprecation in PHP 5.6 if not
in PHP 5.5).

I'd like to apologise for not updating the RFC sooner to attempt to
capture the new arguments made on Internals against deprecation =E2=80=94 I=
've
made an attempt at doing so (without getting deeply into the back and
forth that took place) now that I've had a bit of time, but if anyone
feels misrepresented or would like to detail their argument for
posterity better, please feel free to edit the RFC.

I intend to commit the patch along with the relevant test updates in
the next few days. Admittedly, I'm bad with timeframes, so please
don't hang me if it slips a little. It'll be in before beta 1, I
promise.

Thanks to everyone who participated in the discussion, and
particularly to those who voted. And particularly particularly to Ulf
for going well above and beyond in writing a monster blog post on the
matter (and for his correspondence and help off-list).

Cheers,

Adam, who is serious about that whole beer offer in an earlier e-mail,
no matter how you voted.