Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64170 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 87562 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2012 07:58:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Dec 2012 07:58:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 173.203.6.139 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 173.203.6.139 smtp139.ord.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [173.203.6.139] ([173.203.6.139:41497] helo=smtp139.ord.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E4/30-19753-12050C05 for ; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 02:58:25 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp18.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2571630247; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 02:58:23 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp18.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id BE30430236; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 02:58:22 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <50C0501D.9080605@sugarcrm.com> Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 23:58:21 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "internals@lists.php.net" CC: Sebastian Bergmann References: <50BDB27A.7030205@php.net> <50BED659.8090606@sugarcrm.com> <50BEF28B.6000404@php.net> In-Reply-To: <50BEF28B.6000404@php.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] re2c --no-generation-date From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > Okay. But does the patch look okay? Is it sufficient? How can I force a > rebuild of all files generated through re2c to remove the date from the > files? To which branches should the patch be applied? Thanks! I think 5.5, since we're not touching 5.4 that much anymore, especially not in the parser department. I'm not sure how to force rebuild of all files except for manually doing it, though. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227