Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64153 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75455 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2012 05:06:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Dec 2012 05:06:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.143 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.143 smtp143.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.143] ([67.192.241.143:36431] helo=smtp143.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 21/70-04278-C56DEB05 for ; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:06:37 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp24.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8686A1804C2; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 00:06:34 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp24.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 2FDBD1804BA; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 00:06:34 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <50BED659.8090606@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 21:06:33 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "internals@lists.php.net" CC: Sebastian Bergmann References: <50BDB27A.7030205@php.net> In-Reply-To: <50BDB27A.7030205@php.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] re2c --no-generation-date From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > Any objections to applying the attached patch? This would suppress date > output in the generated output so that (hopefully) files generated by > re2c are not changed during the build just because of the date. I think it is a great idea. If we ever need a date for checked in files, we have it on git commit, date in the text is not useful anyway. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227