Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64092 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 37881 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2012 04:49:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Nov 2012 04:49:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=adam@adamharvey.name; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=adam@adamharvey.name; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain adamharvey.name designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: adam@adamharvey.name X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.170 mail-ob0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.170] ([209.85.214.170:36818] helo=mail-ob0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EF/80-30696-669E6B05 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 23:49:42 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id wp18so13520924obc.29 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:49:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamharvey.name; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lea9goz/OPfvT1VoOKEC58FH2bNt/c+ZHpBz+5Dbto8=; b=lHfoLX04CcMVZfHkoMq2VjrgJEYAUcGokegzc2hzshMABmPWP6Gn6Tg73DOPLt/ubM 6WR5kycW+G2JyDSs0JlakPtII7tnxUFYbyZc2UoOEnQtZkBiFw0HdbHJa9iq5choz9S3 Nov+7sGvkuOy0S4Ze7vVMGbcgIlqnxkjIQ4b8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=lea9goz/OPfvT1VoOKEC58FH2bNt/c+ZHpBz+5Dbto8=; b=kQKCe2g5OsRTcbt56/1hqY/Bh81oMExrmVIwjPaVwPoRkyAShDOHXH9pnkQqkufd1B 0TL7agomcCDempi9aUIxwwvhkxmiCsTCn9IhSICiNan+LQkhjN0EgM2lXYmTtH9r8V7b qjqlhJVzwwy/sfj55GbCRz7aDIcVh4+uAeKTnvsn1ZeT1vMjoB7cQSSO/r7eC2BqlhIC sXCf1qNllSactgpCJCjd4HzeIqaCcNMEZXPXa4uX6tnmAw2JWhHa4ixYVgRMzB7/ePq2 SxmLQ2QSkBnYTP3QL/zUaLeBw2K2y+EETcEzJaziLuRlrUqqwJAqZMh3DkbZvWgaPdWH 8iww== Received: by 10.182.212.70 with SMTP id ni6mr6898954obc.44.1354164579089; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:49:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: adam@adamharvey.name Received: by 10.76.123.75 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:49:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:49:18 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LqoMiO_Ep-ZTseCKjRxCHDgQaLk Message-ID: To: Anthony Ferrara Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmDnvh/lUpntXTZCh8wsfTlzyTsInK0mOYEwtKJqLI23GsyYmCb/RO0vv6JnN0BeVCV6E0D Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] ext/mysql deprecation in 5.5 From: aharvey@php.net (Adam Harvey) On 29 November 2012 00:36, Anthony Ferrara wrote: > However, I'd like to ask you to do something else here. Can you please > update the RFC to reflect the discussions that happened on list? Not > everything that was talked about, but the major discussion points at leas= t. > That way it's there for future reference, and people who didn't read the > entire discussion thread can get a summary before they vote. As it sits n= ow, > it doesn't really present all sides of the issue well... I agree =E2=80=94 I actually was hoping to update the RFC post-discussion t= o reflect what had been discussed, but I've had a bit of a perfect storm of problems this week that have prevented me from putting any real time into PHP matters. I can have a look at revising the RFC on the weekend, but if you or someone else wanted to summarise the main "no" position and insert it before that, I'd have absolutely no objections. Thanks, Adam