Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64078 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 50854 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2012 16:36:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Nov 2012 16:36:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=r@roze.lv; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=r@roze.lv; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain roze.lv designates 213.175.74.1 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: r@roze.lv X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.175.74.1 roze.lv Received: from [213.175.74.1] ([213.175.74.1:29812] helo=zeona.lv) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 33/E2-30696-18D36B05 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:36:18 -0500 Received: from MasterPC (unknown [194.19.225.226]) by zeona.lv (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B0B8205E39B7 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:36:14 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <9E27BC3955B441918DE4DCCC56FAB987@MasterPC> To: "PHP Developers Mailing List" References: <50B5D992.30609@lsces.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:36:11 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] ext/mysql deprecation in 5.5 From: r@roze.lv ("Reinis Rozitis") > From: Patrick ALLAERT > > Sorry, but removing the E_DEPRECATED notice when moved to PECL is not part > of the proposed RFC and should certainly not happen. I don't get what is the reason behind it? Yes, the extension is old but it still works perfectly fine and even outperforms the newer mysqli/pdo in some cases and noone will rewrite the legacy apps - so why is there such a hate (I must say) for ISPs and platform providers? If you insist on throwing errors in external pecl extension for me as a server farm administrator it won't leave any choice but to edit the extension code / build custom distro package before putting it on production. rr