Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64075 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41515 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2012 14:50:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Nov 2012 14:50:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=patrick.allaert@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=patrick.allaert@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: patrick.allaert@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.170 mail-ea0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.170] ([209.85.215.170:49252] helo=mail-ea0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 0C/61-30696-AC426B05 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 09:50:50 -0500 Received: by mail-ea0-f170.google.com with SMTP id d11so4150295eaa.29 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:50:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=s9BE4Koe/MFcui75E2ajEPL3LWahDfYXCGAMgRzQ7Fw=; b=OoIrJ51irABgGHdqUgDwJXHhieIOUpqsOFfGWtIEQsrbjm/W/qEiWD7jJ6aJ4ummXz xlOPFomHRk0uZfpqEHUTi/4wnnTW2sVWMM7z3IrACyjedjq0pika9G1rVQpjX71GUjEM Y5ZFWrakfEgVhM4ItjRE2dUGV8ROQM5k5ShwjLw0tx9rAZZyQ+dvgdlQp7jhiQ2ZkKuJ V/NYyKGx3p+asKl4bET9uqTcUkOKv1CzH/i9FYEFKZ6uR7bos8vFtTvYYQFKH2dEqZAu w3PUbSJwrY/6KVHVkGAx/6sDgUZnVvstZHxs0Scd7g1T5x/Gs5uqUR1N8i/bYIF/pbJh 4sYw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.0.71 with SMTP id 47mr16252020eea.19.1354114247608; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:50:47 -0800 (PST) Sender: patrick.allaert@gmail.com Received: by 10.14.185.141 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:50:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50B5D992.30609@lsces.co.uk> References: <50B5D992.30609@lsces.co.uk> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:50:47 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Glomd49xeQ_mjdZuWWePddVjC3E Message-ID: To: Lester Caine Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] ext/mysql deprecation in 5.5 From: patrickallaert@php.net (Patrick ALLAERT) 2012/11/28 Lester Caine : > There is no 'objection' to deprecating the extension, but adding > E_DEPRECATED to the code is problematic since that should NOT be present in > a PECL version of the code? Sorry, but removing the E_DEPRECATED notice when moved to PECL is not part of the proposed RFC and should certainly not happen. If ext/mysql is deprecated, it can perfectly live in PECL while remaining deprecated. There ARE (supported) replacements for ext/mysql and even if someone really one to use it, it should still be considered deprecated regardless of the repository holding the code. > Adding it in one location and not the other does > not make sense. Absolutely! There is no reason to remove that kind of notice in the future. -- Patrick