Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:64008 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 13044 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2012 05:52:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Nov 2012 05:52:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=adam@adamharvey.name; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=adam@adamharvey.name; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain adamharvey.name designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: adam@adamharvey.name X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.170 mail-ob0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.170] ([209.85.214.170:43425] helo=mail-ob0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BE/C3-20662-11C6CA05 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:52:17 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id wp18so7077653obc.29 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:52:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamharvey.name; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=sLIu1Afl2B760jGxwfd0K4cMKgrVEzsOvIy+1TVqqeM=; b=pIiK4lA6MJag/z3Dk2UD1+q2ISRTxLeYW0JnRFnLPBTSBugK49rs63yOIemWR9VTWZ vTLjE+Fxe2pttUoJFh5SJ855ZjxlsmwthyPNebcKskTe40/7hHUU1ld+10MWAuSvPKx6 dxslCyifAmJTvLTISC/GZYTewglM6/go17vdI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=sLIu1Afl2B760jGxwfd0K4cMKgrVEzsOvIy+1TVqqeM=; b=lSpiQCl3c0SbIfs4J+fkjZ7xHAbelYfeQq9aLmHsPA85t5Q00tEM1jdNSZWJ6WEybd 6hVt4rfI9aCNQrNEa/HT2Ekr54Jfi0nv4BTCt/PboDM7O3xkgug+GV/NDFxFg0WpIpTn Ltxy6WUpPw7+O3dmhhrL0Jvqmx7pmh3lr6sU6jRf9p+Ws9LdlXpFyHIcA62onuMoGom9 49vpcJMsT3VMwqAhcHdVHKfn7xvHPm0VHF7ZmN4oyQD0MRUA/L+INF02D/E1b/FMLq9l Y8GLnMkULJjUzBJGT25AhED8jFHZBHY/PmgTcYrjC6IOOUQyrLAfUu96DcxwA1kp98XL wObA== Received: by 10.60.170.10 with SMTP id ai10mr8750654oec.72.1353477134283; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:52:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: adam@adamharvey.name Received: by 10.76.123.75 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:51:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50AC6A7A.6030504@sugarcrm.com> References: <23CB37F5-E956-4A5C-8ECC-7CF347A9086C@roshambo.org> <50AC6A7A.6030504@sugarcrm.com> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:51:54 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: vzMeBEtyEVMVmslPB0l6CsCGGrM Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: Philip Olson , PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlyvbMLI3d+2bROF4l9TzLXH41NY3sQr5jiMV46pyxQS6d2xGKi0+zaUoz8Lp9KZVqrXWHJ Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Where did the _logo_ functions go? From: aharvey@php.net (Adam Harvey) On 21 November 2012 13:45, Stas Malyshev wrote: >> Proposal: I propose we revert this change. Future consideration might > > I see no reason to revert the change and keep dragging around the GUIDs. > Data URLs are much better and cleaner solution, and only reasons not to > do it are purely bureaucratic, for which I don't care much. We could > keep the functions, but what these functions would do? The issue I have with this is just that we don't seem to be making much of an effort to stick to the promises we've made around BC when it doesn't suit us to. I agree: in practice, I can't imagine anyone caring a jot about these functions being removed, but we've said that when we're going to remove something, we'll deprecate for a minor release, then remove. Why don't we live up to it? Adam