Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:63970
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.210.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAyV7nF3VyvCa_YCYrtaajm8b8CpTCUq7M6=07hJ5eCGBaUZrA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADajX4CYZdNpgQv46m_6J7tQLBc=h6HxCn-bGpxr3Ou2VaqgBg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACwt+JeLin8aLtmBedO+DnJ4cz0Ajb75depkd7v_QK1NORUPOg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADajX4CmOEBy3aZOh+qpfmq=OTiLF6+EuOyiRWM2bx7JxZumrg@mail.gmail.com>
	<50A9F799.5080909@codeangel.org>
	<CADajX4CbLLagJnO+dkZsGXkaS8h7rabtmpOz6Gos0KqcHOpsMA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAyV7nF3VyvCa_YCYrtaajm8b8CpTCUq7M6=07hJ5eCGBaUZrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:54:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU6DG049yezXJtUrbbVQnWVwZpnsANhQG9ZsZzESBb1-Mg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com>
Cc: Adam Harvey <aharvey@php.net>, Chad Emrys <admin@codeangel.org>, 
	Patrick Allaert <patrickallaert@php.net>, 
	"internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: ext/mysql deprecation
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

hi Anthony,

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com> wrot=
e:
> Adam,
>
> My intention at this stage is to call a vote next Monday: it feels
>> like the discussion has mostly died down now (which isn't to say I
>> think we're at a consensus necessarily =97 it just feels as though the
>> flurry of opinions have been made and argued either way), and I'm
>> hoping that everyone can have a think about where and how they'd like
>> to see this move forward (if at all) between now and then. Given we've
>> only just hit alpha 1, I don't think we need to rush into a decision
>> right now for the sake of one.
>>
>
> I completely agree.
>
> I would suggest one thing though. When it comes up for a vote, please
> either make 2 questions:
>
> 1. Should ext/mysql be hard-deprecated in 5.5
> 2. Should ext/mysql be soft-deprecated in 5.5 and hard-deprecated in NEXT
>
> Or 4 options to deprecation:
>
> 1. Hard-deprecated in 5.5
> 2. Soft-deprecated in 5.5 and hard-deprecated in NEXT
> 3. Either
> 4. Neither
>
> That way both viewpoints can be voted on in one vote. And we can get an
> accurate count of the thoughts...

Hard/soft deprecated?

I suppose by "soft" you mean not actually deprecated but only
documented as such?

The on connect only notice is rather soft, tbh :)

Cheers,
--
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org