Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:63969
Return-Path: <ircmaxell@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 27027 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2012 12:44:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 19 Nov 2012 12:44:43 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ircmaxell@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ircmaxell@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.176 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ircmaxell@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.176 mail-wi0-f176.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.212.176] ([209.85.212.176:53589] helo=mail-wi0-f176.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id C0/90-21651-9B92AA05 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 07:44:42 -0500
Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id cb5so4320514wib.11
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:44:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=fTPNuLxM3LzURCz95Idb+OqYm/fBPFp6iYeAcyxiLFs=;
        b=i2i2RyNJJogTU2Y1xCKU8Tl5gYYL6sVRa5kCtz30yZssYPbwFdzogEyKjFNWQ+2IFb
         eDBY7o5j+PG4VrixRCeRP8/RvPeW0B45Y8bnyRe55AM7XicqHifQCC2dQNycaJi4LcCB
         evq9E3GckL1XsOruHMF4nmfhcEWW4wyx/+6QGlYvrIGZgtdfcpJ7b0yy2G5qSlRD+dVf
         6zwRYxC7yk6/FyFqhEH8K059cZR8oJksU1gDOlO/ybAIERPPpC27HneQYwQt8Nx6mCl2
         6EjUmQdsg4IvYezfwxyqdbk42OGAdpE5uUPCEoHPpezvqXoY+ayZqW190NRiJWzINq6v
         ZiTQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.195.144 with SMTP id p16mr4302988wen.174.1353329079243;
 Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:44:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.162.68 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:44:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CADajX4CbLLagJnO+dkZsGXkaS8h7rabtmpOz6Gos0KqcHOpsMA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADajX4CYZdNpgQv46m_6J7tQLBc=h6HxCn-bGpxr3Ou2VaqgBg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACwt+JeLin8aLtmBedO+DnJ4cz0Ajb75depkd7v_QK1NORUPOg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADajX4CmOEBy3aZOh+qpfmq=OTiLF6+EuOyiRWM2bx7JxZumrg@mail.gmail.com>
	<50A9F799.5080909@codeangel.org>
	<CADajX4CbLLagJnO+dkZsGXkaS8h7rabtmpOz6Gos0KqcHOpsMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 07:44:39 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAyV7nF3VyvCa_YCYrtaajm8b8CpTCUq7M6=07hJ5eCGBaUZrA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Harvey <aharvey@php.net>
Cc: Chad Emrys <admin@codeangel.org>, Patrick Allaert <patrickallaert@php.net>, 
	"internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016369205ba0854c204ced87b1e
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: ext/mysql deprecation
From: ircmaxell@gmail.com (Anthony Ferrara)

--0016369205ba0854c204ced87b1e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Adam,

My intention at this stage is to call a vote next Monday: it feels
> like the discussion has mostly died down now (which isn't to say I
> think we're at a consensus necessarily =97 it just feels as though the
> flurry of opinions have been made and argued either way), and I'm
> hoping that everyone can have a think about where and how they'd like
> to see this move forward (if at all) between now and then. Given we've
> only just hit alpha 1, I don't think we need to rush into a decision
> right now for the sake of one.
>

I completely agree.

I would suggest one thing though. When it comes up for a vote, please
either make 2 questions:

1. Should ext/mysql be hard-deprecated in 5.5
2. Should ext/mysql be soft-deprecated in 5.5 and hard-deprecated in NEXT

Or 4 options to deprecation:

1. Hard-deprecated in 5.5
2. Soft-deprecated in 5.5 and hard-deprecated in NEXT
3. Either
4. Neither

That way both viewpoints can be voted on in one vote. And we can get an
accurate count of the thoughts...

Anthony

--0016369205ba0854c204ced87b1e--