Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:63963 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 82070 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2012 00:19:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Nov 2012 00:19:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cpriest@zerocue.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cpriest@zerocue.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zerocue.com designates 67.200.53.250 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cpriest@zerocue.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.200.53.250 mail.zerocue.com Received: from [67.200.53.250] ([67.200.53.250:52424] helo=mail.zerocue.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 89/D8-08060-91B79A05 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 19:19:41 -0500 Received: from [172.17.0.122] (unknown [72.179.52.187]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.zerocue.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 138A5120382 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 00:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <50A97B13.8040303@zerocue.com> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:19:31 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [RFC] Property Accessors v1.2 Consensus Changes From: cpriest@zerocue.com (Clint Priest) Can anyone who has an interest in this project please review over the "Current Consensus Changes" section of this document: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax-as-implemented/change-requests Lets hear if there are any other concerns, otherwise in the next couple of days I will integrate these changes into the main RFC document and begin work on the changes from 1.1 -> 1.2. Still left open (undecided) is internal accessor method visibility and callability. Primarily this is between Stas and Nikita, I prefer not visible (makes more sense to me) but callable (less difficult to implement, simpler for the code). I would appreciate some more input on this topic from anyone interested. How long is it before 5.5 is in feature-freeze? I'm guessing at this point that this will not make the 5.5 release, but depends on the powers that be. -Clint -- -Clint