Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:63780
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: sebastian.krebs.berlin@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAAyV7nEVEjV0m2uwhSBnP3P6LYt2hRHkwSN72M=WHoCdf=gZSA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA9esySnj2vtHOd9fiJ5vDHHv5+jJv3Bu1ADw=XOpepXZQMcpg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAyV7nEVEjV0m2uwhSBnP3P6LYt2hRHkwSN72M=WHoCdf=gZSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 14:38:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CALtuQzC2wcQh2qnPkCPJ866M5Zas-HchZEMH2gPB5EVKhPdeCQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: PHP internals list <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b343884d431b204cdfbf4c1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Implement a LoggerInterface to PHP
From: krebs.seb@gmail.com (Sebastian Krebs)

--047d7b343884d431b204cdfbf4c1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

2012/11/8 Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com>

> Florin,
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Florin Razvan Patan
> <florinpatan@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > After a talk on the Symfony framework here:
> > https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/5911
> > Long story short, the point that @Seldaek suggestion to have a common
> > interface for loggers
> > actually makes sense and the best way to have it would be to have PHP
> > include it by default.
> >
> > I'm not sure exactly what amount of work this implies, nor my C skills
> > are existent, but with
> > PHP having such an interface available it would help standardize
> > things in the PHP world.
> >
> > Also, I'm not sure if this could be backported into existing PHP 5.3
> > or PHP 5.4 versions
> > but this would make sense to consider it for PHP 5.5.
> >
> > What do you guys think? Could this be considered to be included in PHP?
> >
> > Thank you for your time.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Florin
> >
>
> Pedantically speaking, isn't this the exact goal of the FIG/PSR group? That
> they define these common parts?
>

There are already discussing this (to be honest: For months now).

Some are mentioned at the pull requests at
https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/pulls


>
> Is there an advantage to having it in C (performance, etc)? If so, there
> may be something to discuss. But if it's just to enforce a common paradigm,
> I'd say leave that to the community to do. They are in a better position
> and can change their mind if they need to. Something that core is
> reasonably positioned to not do...
>
> Anthony
>



-- 
github.com/KingCrunch

--047d7b343884d431b204cdfbf4c1--