Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:6377
Return-Path: <derick@php.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 40043 invoked by uid 1010); 12 Dec 2003 21:40:14 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 40002 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2003 21:40:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO jdi.jdimedia.nl) (212.204.192.51)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2003 21:40:13 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by jdi.jdimedia.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBCLeAn9016240;
	Fri, 12 Dec 2003 22:40:10 +0100
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 22:40:10 +0100 (CET)
X-X-Sender: derick@localhost
To: Moriyoshi Koizumi <moriyoshi@at.wakwak.com>
cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312122133300.25743@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312122238380.25743@localhost>
References: <25BBBBC2-2CD2-11D8-8FCC-000A95CE0C62@at.wakwak.com>
 <200312121407.48578.ilia@prohost.org> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312121100100.1008@thinkpad.lerdorf.com>
 <200312121442.54406.ilia@prohost.org> <0E6C8F5C-2CDB-11D8-9F07-000A95CE0C62@at.wakwak.com>
 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312122133300.25743@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Regarding the latest patch on fgetcsv() (stable
 branch)
From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans)

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Derick Rethans wrote:

> On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
>
> > On 2003/12/13, at 4:42, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> >
> > > On a related note I should mention that fgetcsv() in 4.3.X is
> > > currently 2.5
> > > times faster then it's equivalent in 5.X.
> >
> > I don't know why you're mentioning this at this time,
> > but I can say it is a sort of necessary evil :) Because the HEAD
> > version is capable of handling various encodings, and
> > less intricate IMO. Rather, I was surprised about that result,
> > it's only 2.5 times slower :)
>
> I would call that rather unacceptable actually. Isn't it possible create
> a new function for this which handles this MB 'crap' (and the same for

"crap" is a poor choice of words, I had no plans to insult you in
anyway. My apologies for that.

Derick