Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:63743 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 23864 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2012 13:37:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Nov 2012 13:37:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=julienpauli@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=julienpauli@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.210.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: julienpauli@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.210.170 mail-ia0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.210.170] ([209.85.210.170:61843] helo=mail-ia0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A5/C8-00811-E21C7905 for ; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 08:37:50 -0500 Received: by mail-ia0-f170.google.com with SMTP id e16so4983927iaa.29 for ; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 05:37:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=YkIFpXj7SCOEFa4/Gt03082pNood0yUGxL3MgVIZIWA=; b=lfzauGAgwG/6erRJfvFjAoL90yZNebu+RB8++here7h4OWa9PWLpNIrh0U/Q6Pbl35 qnKbTXi34itm5PvTIKq1lFytaCTUJVnBLgi8o1JQ5YyabRjTCZ0i+Dh9h+9JAbmfsP8y wZ7dkpdhEohJhvXWmBuIPvCSeOQUalBcmkERgc6VGnhTfMQgK09dhaob5OfVcfGelqhT W+/LN/yoLwRh3wwUb3wH22oHRtLvnYynxYGBqYaTTOzGXsM1Tze0MTGB0DHtZwgWTeX2 92nlX0oNJAikAGZWwNeGWQmMUDcAfPMfzIpAugdp5EOTpNqyMt1enGxoUa87BDTgZg8t T6og== Received: by 10.50.212.97 with SMTP id nj1mr9198772igc.26.1352122668177; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 05:37:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: julienpauli@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.140.106 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 05:37:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <508F971F.2000009@php.net> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:37:07 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: vBA9STPzS6AsbBToIb3iqTcWDco Message-ID: To: Kalle Sommer Nielsen Cc: "dsp@php.net" , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Branching PHP-5.5 From: jpauli@php.net (jpauli) On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote: > Hi David > > 2012/10/30 dsp@php.net > >> Hi Internals, >> >> it's been a while since we started talking about PHP 5.5 and we are >> already a little bit late with my release plans. I've started reviewing >> the current master and came to the conclusion that it does make more >> sense to me to branch 5.5 of master for a few reasons: >> > > It's been a while since I contributed anything to the core, however I > remember what a mess it was to cross merge back in the CVS days and I > honestly do not see a big reason to make a "bigger" mess by branching yet > another version, I think we can easily cope with having 5.5 as the current > master branch like we did with the original 6.0 so until 5.4 is gonna > "retire" or go into security fixes only mode like 5.3 currently is, then I > think it makes a little sense to do so. > > Now I realize that we are trying to speed up releases and I probably > skipped a few discussions which will render my mail here void, but until > 5.4 is in "security-fixes-only" mode then I think 5.5 should remain as the > current master. Hey :-) AFAIK, we cant afford BC Breaks in 5.5 Kalle, do you mean you'd like to commit to master and, when release time comes, create a branch from master and name it 5.5 ? (tagging it for releases) ? We have to be really carefull about breaks, I think we should leave master as the master branch and rebase commits from it to 5.5 branch choosing what we want to merge or not. What are git skilled people thinking ? Julien.P