Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:63565 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 59375 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2012 14:39:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Oct 2012 14:39:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cpriest@zerocue.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cpriest@zerocue.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zerocue.com designates 74.115.204.53 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cpriest@zerocue.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.115.204.53 relay-hub203.domainlocalhost.com Received: from [74.115.204.53] ([74.115.204.53:26561] helo=relay-hub203.domainlocalhost.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 15/B2-22055-AA7B2805 for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 10:39:43 -0400 Received: from MBX202.domain.local ([169.254.127.11]) by HUB203.domain.local ([192.168.68.47]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 10:39:35 -0400 To: Pierre Joye CC: "internals@lists.php.net" Thread-Topic: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Accessors v1.1 -> v1.2 Summary Thread-Index: Ac2uTntzAOwvWkenT86tCjQWvOemIwAfv3WAAADEJvA= Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 14:39:35 +0000 Message-ID: <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE4856140B976@MBX202.domain.local> References: <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485612C2581@MBX214.domain.local> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.64.22] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Accessors v1.1 -> v1.2 Summary From: cpriest@zerocue.com (Clint Priest) The problem was that the RFC had been updated past where the code was, AFAI= K you can't branch a wiki page, can you? That's what needed branching... u= nless you mean to create a v1.1 page and a v1.2 page, which is basically wh= at I've done... > -----Original Message----- > From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 5:16 AM > To: Clint Priest > Cc: internals@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Accessors v1.1 -> v1.2 Summary >=20 > On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Clint Priest wrote= : > > Hey everyone, seems like the conversations have died down and I've atte= mpted to go back through all of the emails and produce a > 1.1 -> 1.2 document which summarizes what I believe are decided, being de= bated, issues, todos, etc. > > > > Pierre had pointed out that I had partially changed the "as-implemented= " document which no longer reflected what the fork > implements. So... I have reverted that document to the 1.1 version. >=20 > You can use branches as well, and refer to them in the RFC. Going back an= d forth and loosing track or ability to test a given feature or > option is not that good to evaluate the choices :) >=20 > Cheers, > -- > Pierre >=20 > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org