Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:63478 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 58029 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2012 00:06:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Oct 2012 00:06:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cpriest@zerocue.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cpriest@zerocue.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zerocue.com designates 74.115.204.40 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cpriest@zerocue.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.115.204.40 relay-hub204.domainlocalhost.com Received: from [74.115.204.40] ([74.115.204.40:54076] helo=relay-hub204.domainlocalhost.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 93/CB-29764-F96FD705 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:06:56 -0400 Received: from MBX202.domain.local ([169.254.169.44]) by HUB204.domain.local ([192.168.68.48]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.003; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:05:57 -0400 To: "internals@lists.php.net" Thread-Topic: Alternatives to mailing list? Thread-Index: Ac2r+yaKV800bwFvROS7I4T6JBEbhw== Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:05:57 +0000 Message-ID: <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485612B78D3@MBX202.domain.local> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.64.21] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485612B78D3MBX202domainloc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Alternatives to mailing list? From: cpriest@zerocue.com (Clint Priest) --_000_9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485612B78D3MBX202domainloc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Is it just me or has this Property Accessors chain of emails been impossibl= e to make heads or tails of? People replying within replies within replies= , quoting partial emails, cross-posting and all sorts of chaos. Would anyone be willing to entertain an alternative "communication method" = with specific respect to building/refining an RFC or fleshing out an idea? Heck, I think even live chat meeting over IRC would beat what's been going = on... Not saying abandon the mailing list, it's crucial, but when there gets to b= e 150+ emails on one subject and numerous sub-subjects it just seems ineffi= cient at best and chaos at its worst... I don't know of anything offhand that would work well but I'd be willing to= try and find something we could try out. -Clint --_000_9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485612B78D3MBX202domainloc_--