Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:63453
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <507D3B6D.1090308@sugarcrm.com>
References: <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485612B53E4@MBX202.domain.local>
 <507D24E0.9070203@sugarcrm.com> <CACxA8bkuNM98fMm948a=BrxVSjY3K0u9n74HMELuxZXWDHB0Pg@mail.gmail.com>
 <507D2C54.6030702@sugarcrm.com> <CACxA8bm8q4uFR5dWGOmvJYS_ofY3JDiOvzJn6bmyY_1sEdRBSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <507D3459.3020900@sugarcrm.com> <CACxA8bn_LAdp-xo8waZ7MW4G4cZNhO1=fmSH6iQeLh3T=1LGZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <507D3B6D.1090308@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 03:51:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CACxA8bmGEKprAitn7NyyZ1zU5F+Q6cKg=2K7bxn0oVRzge=49A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
Cc: Clint Priest <cpriest@zerocue.com>, 
	"internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb2066eb8747904cc2af1d7
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PHP-DEV [RFC] Property Accessors v1.2
From: tbprogrammer@gmail.com (Jazzer Dane)

--e89a8fb2066eb8747904cc2af1d7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I apologize for my confusing terminology - let me elaborate. There are no
special syntaxes. The below code should help clear things up a bit:

class MyClass {
>   private $otherProperty;
>   public $property {
>     get() {}; // Does not "have a body", as there is no code between the
> curly braces.
>     set($value) { $this->otherProperty = $value; } // Does "have a body",
> as there IS code between the curly braces.
>   }
> }
>

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>wrote:

> Hi!
>
> > Stas, the proposed "solution" thus far is to make the getter or setter
> > final and private and not have a body. This would naturally throw an
> > exception if it was accessed from anywhere but the class it was defined.
> > The class it was defined in has to remember that it is virtually a
> > read/write only accessor.
>
> What you mean by "not have a body" - is there special syntax for
> body-less methods introduced? Then it should be in the RFC. How it is
> implemented - what exactly is stored in the function table then?
>
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
> (408)454-6900 ext. 227
>

--e89a8fb2066eb8747904cc2af1d7--