Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:63437 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 10890 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2012 09:26:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Oct 2012 09:26:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 207.97.245.203 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 207.97.245.203 smtp203.iad.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [207.97.245.203] ([207.97.245.203:43989] helo=smtp203.iad.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B2/96-10021-F582D705 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 05:26:55 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp40.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2549A350296; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 05:26:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp40.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 3EC54350297; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 05:26:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <507D285A.3010701@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:26:50 +0300 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Dragoonis CC: Clint Priest , "internals@lists.php.net" References: <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485612B3B48@MBX202.domain.local> <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485612B3B76@MBX202.domain.local> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Propety Accessors v1.1 From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > What remains on your TODO list for this functionality? > When are you planning to run an RFC vote on this? > > I think this would be a valuable addition to PHP 5.5. I think we shouldn't rush with votes on this until all fine details aren't hashed out. This is a *huge* feature - one of the biggest ones recently, and has a lot of implications for various scenarios. Property access is what virtually every script in existence does, and doing changes there have implications that touch every corner of the engine. I think Clint is doing a great job with this RFC, but we need to carefully work through all the corners and side cases and relationships with all other features before we can declare it's ready for the prime time. Exactly because it is such a big deal it needs to be refined and polished. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227