Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:63384 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 31609 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2012 04:56:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Oct 2012 04:56:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cpriest@zerocue.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cpriest@zerocue.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zerocue.com designates 74.115.204.41 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cpriest@zerocue.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.115.204.41 relay-hub205.domainlocalhost.com Received: from [74.115.204.41] ([74.115.204.41:15200] helo=relay-hub205.domainlocalhost.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6F/86-06472-F54F8705 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 00:56:00 -0400 Received: from MBX202.domain.local ([169.254.169.44]) by HUB205.domain.local ([192.168.68.49]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.003; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 00:55:11 -0400 To: Jazzer Dane CC: "internals@lists.php.net" Thread-Topic: [PHP-DEV] [PHP-DEV [RFC] Property Accessors v1.2 Thread-Index: Ac2oOZ3+vAOzWRcnRpOb6a/hOVK5+AAIt0kAACicS9A= Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 04:55:11 +0000 Message-ID: <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485612B577E@MBX202.domain.local> References: <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485612B53E4@MBX202.domain.local> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.64.25] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485612B577EMBX202domainloc_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [PHP-DEV [RFC] Property Accessors v1.2 From: cpriest@zerocue.com (Clint Priest) --_000_9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485612B577EMBX202domainloc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yeah, if you check out the section in the RFC on static properties I give e= xamples of both of these cases, I have not tested the use of static::$zz th= ough come to think of it, I will put it on my todo list. From: Jazzer Dane [mailto:tbprogrammer@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 12:32 AM To: Clint Priest Cc: internals@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PHP-DEV [RFC] Property Accessors v1.2 I like it. I assume that, in regards to static properties, the static keyword works ju= st as well as self and parent, correct? On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Clint Priest > wrote: Alright, here is the updated RFC as per discussions for the last few days: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax-as-implemented If you could read it over, make sure I have all of your concerns correctly = addressed and we can leave this open for the two week waiting period while = I make the final code changes. -Clint --_000_9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485612B577EMBX202domainloc_--