Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:63375 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 60197 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2012 12:32:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Oct 2012 12:32:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=robin@kingsquare.nl; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=robin@kingsquare.nl; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain kingsquare.nl from 77.72.144.59 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: robin@kingsquare.nl X-Host-Fingerprint: 77.72.144.59 2-smtp.kingsquare.nl Received: from [77.72.144.59] ([77.72.144.59:35356] helo=2-smtp.kingsquare.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 4B/4A-06472-BCD08705 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 08:32:11 -0400 Received: from sprinkler.kingsquare.nl (5351426C.cm-6-2b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.81.66.108]) by 2-smtp.kingsquare.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD5E460061; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:32:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.0.0.110] (unknown [10.0.0.110]) by sprinkler.kingsquare.nl (Postfix running for Kingsquare Information Services) with ESMTP id E33208C10D; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:32:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <50780DCA.6000807@kingsquare.nl> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:32:10 +0200 Organization: Kingsquare Information Services User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cal CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485612B53E4@MBX202.domain.local> <5078040A.6080604@icical.net> In-Reply-To: <5078040A.6080604@icical.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PHP-DEV [RFC] Property Accessors v1.2 From: robin@kingsquare.nl ("Kingsquare.nl - Robin Speekenbrink") Please ignore me... i'm a n00b and my mail programme F*cked me... my bad Regards, Robin Speekenbrink Kingsquare BV On vrijdag 12 oktober 2012 13:50:34, Cal wrote: > > Le 12/10/2012 11:48, Nikita Popov a écrit : >> I've been thinking a bit about the automatic properties again, and >> noticed that I forgot to name one use case: Asymmetric accessor >> visibility. Automatic properties may be useful in that context, so >> that you can write "public $foo { get; protected set; }" (though they >> don't necessarily need to be implemented as properties with auto >> generated code, rather just properties with more detailed visibility >> handling [a bit related to the stuff Amaury has been saying]). > > I agree. >