Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:63316
Return-Path: <leight@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 97279 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2012 09:29:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 10 Oct 2012 09:29:39 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=leight@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=leight@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.170 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: leight@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.170 mail-qc0-f170.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.216.170] ([209.85.216.170:61639] helo=mail-qc0-f170.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id A8/61-23031-10045705 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 05:29:39 -0400
Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id d42so234184qca.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=z4RxZ/MK93D69jRQjzYeDYbFQMbA3X+dCUuLWlFUOLM=;
        b=TN5n0Uh55TPG1Hx7Um5X1Hxdnv2cUY7sDtnC54j6D0b5oyLMeWVE7vAZH55ePuOxkm
         RbnLaRSepbMumOd2Fj+1qQYnsoGFKfclTak9TVKO8I/nY+z2AeGbgF/xN+lBMik4OSV3
         1CViuO+fiz9BRy0ZxNlZDDrfmqekR+qIbyuaiAe1076nBEmF9zHutZ0JSbS8qxPBxCl/
         Q2GagUWg0h//eiFHTXOwmdfUvvtHKe2/ck4Eg+zUoO8JLmYgCKkdPqqg29pI1moQ5VRJ
         dj3KXjGJehWp+XOSoX4pcDJjCU71bt0/mB1e1K/NgPiSi1vbSsqWYSGxFz7HLWDpQUdm
         moVg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.178.5 with SMTP id bk5mr39112332qab.15.1349861375573; Wed,
 10 Oct 2012 02:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.107.163 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHjTTqM_5kE43aRHP=6Kcu=2zqNGhwReJgfpiMjXECUdZJboJg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485612B3B48@MBX202.domain.local>
	<CAPwsocHLimh+b=tdnEUethFX84esA8w0STup-hf-a963tXinMA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACxA8bn=s6S7jc9rCAUd-40fgscxkJKKCRt77CWpCsSbgRzdrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<9570D903A3BECE4092E924C2985CE485612B496D@MBX202.domain.local>
	<CAHjTTqM_5kE43aRHP=6Kcu=2zqNGhwReJgfpiMjXECUdZJboJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:29:35 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPwsocEiOAmgc6XNj8yRXEMF1vhj25bipTgxq_XVrU2AEabtxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bernhard Schussek <bschussek@gmail.com>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Propety Accessors v1.1
From: leight@gmail.com (Leigh)

On 10 October 2012 08:46, Bernhard Schussek <bschussek@gmail.com> wrote:

> Second, I'd like to throw in the idea of array accessors. I mentioned
> this before, but did not get any response.
>
> public $Addresses {
>     offsetSet($offset, $value) { ... }
>     offsetGet() { ... }
>     offsetUnset($offset) { ... }
>     offsetExists($offset) { ... }
> }

Definitely on the "nice to have" list.