Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:6312
Return-Path: <paj@pearfr.org>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 15612 invoked by uid 1010); 9 Dec 2003 20:16:22 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 15575 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2003 20:16:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp1.netcologne.de) (194.8.194.112)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2003 20:16:21 -0000
Received: from localhost.localdomain (xdsl-213-196-230-124.netcologne.de [213.196.230.124])
	by smtp1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 0D8CA388A5; Tue,  9 Dec 2003 21:16:19 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 21:16:20 +0100
To: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>
Cc: wez@thebrainroom.com, thies@thiesos.org, internals@lists.php.net
Message-ID: <20031209211620.5cf395db.paj@pearfr.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312092111200.1767@localhost>
References: <AE808FE6-2A7B-11D8-8016-000393C4A12A@thiesos.org>
	<05e501c3be8e$bc5c39a0$8802a8c0@obsidian>
	<20031209210909.27d72a7e.paj@pearfr.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0312092111200.1767@localhost>
Organization: Freelancer
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] oci in pecl...
From: paj@pearfr.org (Pierre-Alain Joye)

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 21:12:44 +0100 (CET)
Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:57:52 -0000
> > "Wez Furlong" <wez@thebrainroom.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > if we get a new maintainer, i'd like him to be able to roll
> > > > independent from the main-tree. (also - don't forget - not too
> > > > many ppls use oracle, and those who do would be more than happy
> > > > to get new features/improvemnt from a new maintainer)
> > >
> > > This is precisely what I want to encourage in PECL.
> >
> > Fully aggreed (if that count ;) ). I really like the idea to work on
> > package release basis in preference of "horrible" CVS tags ;).
> 
> For this to work pear install <pecl package> needs to work first.

Tomas and I asked many times the help of internals guys and posted a RFC
for binary packages :). But I missed the install error, damnit :P

> Try "pear install tidy" -> doesn't work, while "pear download tidy"
> works fine.

http://pear.php.net/bugs/ is a good start :-D


> And as the pear installer has as much docs as the Zend
> engine... I've no time/clue on where to start looking for the problem
> ;-)

docs? what's that?

pierre