Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:63013 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 241 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2012 09:26:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Sep 2012 09:26:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=remi@fedoraproject.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=remi@fedoraproject.org; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fedoraproject.org from 212.27.42.5 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: remi@fedoraproject.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.27.42.5 smtp5-g21.free.fr Linux 2.6 Received: from [212.27.42.5] ([212.27.42.5:55805] helo=smtp5-g21.free.fr) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 80/0E-02694-7D944505 for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 05:26:49 -0400 Received: from dixsept.famillecollet.com (unknown [82.241.130.121]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4AED48031 for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 11:26:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <505449D0.7070108@fedoraproject.org> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 11:26:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120912 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP Internals References: <50543282.7040201@fedoraproject.org> <505445B6.9050609@lsces.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <505445B6.9050609@lsces.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Download PHP binaries From: remi@fedoraproject.org (Remi Collet) Le 15/09/2012 11:09, Lester Caine a écrit : > Last night I spent a couple of hours again trying to find an 'off the > shelf' distribution that even had PHP5.4 and Apache2.4 ... Fedora 18 have httpd 2.4.3 and php 5.4.7 ;) (I have backports for f17) > With reference to your own repository Remi - it only supports the PHP > elements and MySQL? Where does it link to Apache? Update from httpd 2.2 to 2.4 is not so simple... Mainly the new access configuration (Require vs Allow) imply a lot of work, and I don't want to break existing installations. I think mod_access_compat doesn't work exactly as expected. It is ok to "protect" a directory, but not to "open" one (access still denied by mod_authz_core) Remi.