Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:62927 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 88404 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2012 17:54:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Sep 2012 17:54:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.223.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.223.170 mail-ie0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.223.170] ([209.85.223.170:33412] helo=mail-ie0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 04/88-35669-A592E405 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:54:34 -0400 Received: by ieak14 with SMTP id k14so4091399iea.29 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:54:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=b0Bo1PCRky4k1HfqxUevCO+s67M7HEmMij3ifvKVK4o=; b=XTAi9rXIdTi4j+D8EDknyMzFRbLMIjfRRGkdDFaqgopvEPdVYra8fIWS4MHwusI0ll MIggFvDuF4vwVyyzCln/kcMwdHia+yWj59zIGO7XeJd8iwsdCoELzzUfHXK0X2nJi6xK wrfCj6NRNilBNEhwNqxecWAz/e3LUh16uBGN8C4JYv66euYkm9WlJgrTdlTyHfp52NGn ngvSrpmuct7kK4cL+r9nj4Z81RF0UBzkuGH80n0DvrcrNAlmIoGtXN5veaq2OhjLfn79 HE0rqt1JJ+9Cl3P7x/HjcC+p0XqBFQ/CgTCDXtZWfsPEwKGLtK4Q1/3I6nfHc4gfhZpp 7vKg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.87.164 with SMTP id az4mr12211050igb.71.1347299671756; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:54:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.60.40 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:54:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:54:31 +0200 Message-ID: To: jpauli Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] What is our definition of a "Backward Compatibility Break" From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi, On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 6:28 PM, jpauli wrote: > Based on our recent discussion on #pecl , I'd like we clarify what we > think is a "BCB" (Backward Compatibility Break) as well as what "only > minor BC breaks" could mean. Change in phpinfo related stuff are minor. Adding a notice or warning is minor or irrelevant. Changing return values (like suddenly returning array instead of integer, f.e.), behaviors or similar things are not allowed in x.y+1. > Stas' recent topic on internals "On BC and interfaces" may serve as a > reflection basis. That's more about internals APIs, which is not what is meant in the release RFCs for x.y+1 releases. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org