Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:62795 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 61501 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2012 13:44:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Sep 2012 13:44:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 213.123.26.184 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.123.26.184 c2beaomr06.btconnect.com Received: from [213.123.26.184] ([213.123.26.184:41492] helo=mail.btconnect.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 71/92-46870-8A506405 for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 09:44:10 -0400 Received: from host81-138-11-136.in-addr.btopenworld.com (EHLO _10.0.0.5_) ([81.138.11.136]) by c2beaomr06.btconnect.com with ESMTP id JCA72657; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:44:05 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <504605A5.3000600@lsces.co.uk> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:44:05 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 Firefox/13.0 SeaMonkey/2.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP internals References: <5040F4D9.80206@sugarcrm.com> <5042946A.80204@sugarcrm.com> <5042A7D6.7050001@lerdorf.com> <50452713.3020307@sugarcrm.com> <5045CAA3.6000409@lsces.co.uk> <5045E044.9080809@lsces.co.uk> <5045F939.6010806@lsces.co.uk> <5045FD98.8080306@lsces.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=tid=0001.0A0B0301.504605A5.004B, actions=TAG X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=7/50, refid=2.7.2:2012.9.4.125416:17:7.944, ip=81.138.11.136, rules=__MOZILLA_MSGID, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __HAS_FROM, __USER_AGENT, __MIME_VERSION, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_MAILTO, __URI_NO_WWW, __CP_URI_IN_BODY, BODY_ENDS_IN_URL, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_1800_1899, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, RDNS_SUSP, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2beaomr06.btconnect.com X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0203.504605A5.01B7:SCFSTAT14830815,ss=1,re=-4.000,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2011-07-25 19:15:43, dmn=2011-05-27 18:58:46, mode=multiengine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] E_STRICT 'errors' - was Are exceptions allowed in php core? From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) Peter Lind wrote: >>From php.ini: > ; display_errors > ; Default Value: On > ; Development Value: On > ; Production Value: Off > > In a production environment with display_errors off, E_STRICT doesn't > crash anything. Actually, even with it on, it doesn't crash anything - > shitty code does, by creating notices and then using header() calls > afterwards to create redirects. > > Solution: fix your server. Fix your code. It worked for the rest of us. Using third party code - joomla - only difference between working and not working is switching E_STRICT on. With display_errors=off one gets a white screen. I was not surprised as I've had this all the way through with code from many sources. Yes a lot of the time you just get the error messages, but a white screen crash has been the norm most of the time so leaving display_errors=on helps while fault finding on the development systems. Most of the production strict fixes have now been committed on my own code, but I think I've still got an older 5.2 machine that still has the earlier code. I THINK one of the crashes comes when using $this in a static function. Certainly a lot of the recoding has been splitting a lot of these out to two separate functions but I've been seeing white screens for the past year as I work through third part code and to be honest since ALL I was changing as E_STRICT I had not looked much closer :( Other than e_strict and fatal as the last message visible. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk