Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:62689 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35321 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2012 20:51:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Sep 2012 20:51:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:51154] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 13/18-17065-3E6C3405 for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 16:51:48 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AC25DE13E; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 21:51:44 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 21:51:43 +0100 (BST) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl To: Will Fitch cc: Andrew Faulds , Pierre Joye , internals@lists.php.net, Benjamin Eberlei , Stas Malyshev In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <5042BC3C.7070208@sugarcrm.com> <50435ABE.4010308@ajf.me> <50436412.7010802@ajf.me> <5043C3E9.2010105@ajf.me> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC for Adding __toString to DateTime From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Sun, 2 Sep 2012, Will Fitch wrote: > On Sep 2, 2012 4:39 PM, "Andrew Faulds" wrote: > > > > On 02/09/12 18:20, Derick Rethans wrote: > >> > >> > >> No it's not unambigious: > >> ..snip... > >> > > I'm a little confused as to what is going on here, but ISO8601 has a UTC > format, YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ. > > I think the issue on most minds is the TZ aspect. I agree with the others > on using UTC. That loses even more information, so I disagree with that even more. cheers, Derick