Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:62674 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98752 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2012 17:10:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Sep 2012 17:10:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:37580] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 44/B0-17065-31393405 for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 13:10:43 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20802DE13E; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 18:10:40 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 18:10:40 +0100 (BST) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl To: Stas Malyshev cc: Gustavo Lopes , PHP internals , Nikita Popov In-Reply-To: <5042BA76.1000100@sugarcrm.com> Message-ID: References: <5042BA76.1000100@sugarcrm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Generators From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Sat, 1 Sep 2012, Stas Malyshev wrote: > > illegal state was written on the RFC when voting opened, and the RFC > > was accepted almost unanimously. As the proposal was accepted as > > such, I saw no valid reason not to merge. In fact, changing the > > proposal after it was voted on would be much more objectionable. > > I definitely did not agree to using exceptions, though I support the > rest of it. Same here. > I'm completely fine with merging it but just for the record I'd like > to note that accepting it doesn't mean we will not tweak it or change > some fine details of it - like how we handle some error situations. Right, so lets remove that exception throwing! cheers, Derick