Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:62577 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 47573 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2012 17:09:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Aug 2012 17:09:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 64.22.89.134 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.22.89.134 oxmail.registrar-servers.com Received: from [64.22.89.134] ([64.22.89.134:49340] helo=oxmail.registrar-servers.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C2/72-35829-65BFC305 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:09:44 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.200] (5ad3285b.bb.sky.com [90.211.40.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oxmail.registrar-servers.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 107CEF0029; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:09:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <503CFB32.8040501@ajf.me> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:09:06 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Will Fitch CC: Pierre Joye , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FC?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ter?= , Yahav Gindi Bar , Stas Malyshev , Nikita Popov , Laruence , PHP Internals References: <503A6003.5030806@sugarcrm.com> <503A63DB.7020601@sugarcrm.com> <1346113261.1892.146.camel@guyrush> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE]Call for voting: support use list in foreach From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrew Faulds) On 28/08/12 18:07, Will Fitch wrote: > I just noticed the RFC is listed in the Accepted category. Did something > change with the 2/3rds voting requirement? Right now, it stands at 64% Yes. I think some naughty folks might have snuck votes in after voting was over. It was certainly >64% when accepted. -- Andrew Faulds http://ajf.me/