Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:62576
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain meetme.com designates 74.125.149.142 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEZPtU4UzWVuKvpwgWDk2_tkSn1VM+-DGbRKH8ts0=fPpZap7w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABBJUpdTqJUExAg0nnVCrbWsEOCE==yJguy7TSwtoMs+GGWS7Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABBJUpcQe6YTZ175ZecBAhHz6eQENT53CkOCYDzC6B9fmQHC8Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<503A6003.5030806@sugarcrm.com>
	<CAF+90c_rrOtMUVM_ZeGpyUHrmHjn15tki8EpHJvrtyLXJi7PVQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<503A63DB.7020601@sugarcrm.com>
	<CAArmra1tFewnJbaojT-4h-wUywdrZrZPb3c81gMfV-RtoaO-kA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANVTSm7WTzyumYscSjBj=D8+uOoTP9V8MTWFR2NKZTF6es+CEw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1346113261.1892.146.camel@guyrush>
	<CAEZPtU4UzWVuKvpwgWDk2_tkSn1VM+-DGbRKH8ts0=fPpZap7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:07:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CAArmra2Tkrq+Yb0YXR5mLa=U6XXK_1xerMXsFKG5UVAu=UEA5g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?= <johannes@schlueters.de>, 
	Yahav Gindi Bar <g.b.yahav@gmail.com>, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>, 
	Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>, Laruence <laruence@php.net>, 
	PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54d4e0a55d14004c8567b8f
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE]Call for voting: support use list in foreach
From: wfitch@meetme.com (Will Fitch)

--bcaec54d4e0a55d14004c8567b8f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I just noticed the RFC is listed in the Accepted category.  Did something
change with the 2/3rds voting requirement?  Right now, it stands at 64% Yes=
.

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:

> hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Johannes Schl=FCter
> <johannes@schlueters.de> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 21:07 +0300, Yahav Gindi Bar wrote:
> >> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Will Fitch <willfitch@php.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Maybe the simplest solution is we have a minimum participation rate
> before
> >> > voting can be closed?
> >> >
> >> Though it make sense - it's a problem, because it'll delay and reject
> some
> >> useful features because of requirements issue.
> >
> > If it is useful it should have enough supporters, else it most likely
> > isn't useful. While there should be an option to actively abstain from
> > voting.
>
> I am not sure the usefulness of this option, but it is possible to add
> a blank field ot any vote.
>
> If the idea is to say 'I do not care enough to vote yes or no' then
> simply vote no as one obviously either did not the RFC or do not want
> it.
>
> But this is off topic again in this thread, what's about creating a
> separate one if you feel like we need to refine this process?
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Pierre
>
> @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
>

--bcaec54d4e0a55d14004c8567b8f--