Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:62571
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.210.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1346113261.1892.146.camel@guyrush>
References: <CABBJUpdTqJUExAg0nnVCrbWsEOCE==yJguy7TSwtoMs+GGWS7Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABBJUpcQe6YTZ175ZecBAhHz6eQENT53CkOCYDzC6B9fmQHC8Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<503A6003.5030806@sugarcrm.com>
	<CAF+90c_rrOtMUVM_ZeGpyUHrmHjn15tki8EpHJvrtyLXJi7PVQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<503A63DB.7020601@sugarcrm.com>
	<CAArmra1tFewnJbaojT-4h-wUywdrZrZPb3c81gMfV-RtoaO-kA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANVTSm7WTzyumYscSjBj=D8+uOoTP9V8MTWFR2NKZTF6es+CEw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1346113261.1892.146.camel@guyrush>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:18:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU4UzWVuKvpwgWDk2_tkSn1VM+-DGbRKH8ts0=fPpZap7w@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?= <johannes@schlueters.de>
Cc: Yahav Gindi Bar <g.b.yahav@gmail.com>, Will Fitch <willfitch@php.net>, 
	Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>, Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>, 
	Laruence <laruence@php.net>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE]Call for voting: support use list in foreach
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

hi,

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Johannes Schl=FCter
<johannes@schlueters.de> wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 21:07 +0300, Yahav Gindi Bar wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Will Fitch <willfitch@php.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Maybe the simplest solution is we have a minimum participation rate be=
fore
>> > voting can be closed?
>> >
>> Though it make sense - it's a problem, because it'll delay and reject so=
me
>> useful features because of requirements issue.
>
> If it is useful it should have enough supporters, else it most likely
> isn't useful. While there should be an option to actively abstain from
> voting.

I am not sure the usefulness of this option, but it is possible to add
a blank field ot any vote.

If the idea is to say 'I do not care enough to vote yes or no' then
simply vote no as one obviously either did not the RFC or do not want
it.

But this is off topic again in this thread, what's about creating a
separate one if you feel like we need to refine this process?

Cheers,
--=20
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org