Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:62570 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 54962 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2012 00:21:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Aug 2012 00:21:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@schlueters.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@schlueters.de; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain schlueters.de from 217.114.211.66 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@schlueters.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.114.211.66 config.schlueters.de Received: from [217.114.211.66] ([217.114.211.66:52869] helo=config.schlueters.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 96/13-58395-FEE0C305 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 20:21:04 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.177] (ppp-88-217-72-140.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.72.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by config.schlueters.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC9F463463; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 02:21:00 +0200 (CEST) To: Yahav Gindi Bar Cc: Will Fitch , Stas Malyshev , Nikita Popov , Laruence , PHP Internals In-Reply-To: References: <503A6003.5030806@sugarcrm.com> <503A63DB.7020601@sugarcrm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 02:21:01 +0200 Message-ID: <1346113261.1892.146.camel@guyrush> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE]Call for voting: support use list in foreach From: johannes@schlueters.de (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=) On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 21:07 +0300, Yahav Gindi Bar wrote: > On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Will Fitch wrote: > > > Maybe the simplest solution is we have a minimum participation rate before > > voting can be closed? > > > Though it make sense - it's a problem, because it'll delay and reject some > useful features because of requirements issue. If it is useful it should have enough supporters, else it most likely isn't useful. While there should be an option to actively abstain from voting. johannes