Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:62569
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.210.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <503A6003.5030806@sugarcrm.com>
References: <CABBJUpdTqJUExAg0nnVCrbWsEOCE==yJguy7TSwtoMs+GGWS7Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABBJUpcQe6YTZ175ZecBAhHz6eQENT53CkOCYDzC6B9fmQHC8Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<503A6003.5030806@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 01:06:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU7GU4LzU5AS5dv5iUZZ3Q6LvCxw1OZJM_GF4y+PutACXw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
Cc: Laruence <laruence@php.net>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE]Call for voting: support use list in foreach
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Aug 26, 2012 7:42 PM, "Stas Malyshev" <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> >    foreach supports list syntax:  11 for yes,  4 for no.   accepted.
> >    foreach supports list with silent token:  2 for yes, 10 for no.  denied.
>
> And here's again the problem with this voting setup. With all these long
> discussions about people not getting votes we have 15 people that
> bothered to vote at all, and essentially the vote is decided by one or
> two single votes, and the vote doesn't even have to be from a PHP
> contributor - but the vote of anybody who can register on PHP wiki is
> enough to decide questions

No. One has to get the vote/rfc karma. If that has changed, we have
you restore this restriction.



> anybody who bothers to vote, which 99% of people just do not.


If one does not participate, his fault.


Btw, we also have the 2/3 rule for language change as well.

Cheers,
Pierre