Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:62565 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 72631 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2012 14:38:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Aug 2012 14:38:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=laruence@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=laruence@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: laruence@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.170 mail-vc0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.220.170] ([209.85.220.170:37732] helo=mail-vc0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1E/E2-58395-D468B305 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:38:05 -0400 Received: by vcbgb30 with SMTP id gb30so5129138vcb.29 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 07:38:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=wAlVOhHgVaN1+m5yzKZi+8VWVbvde2yb2pnBOKekCRE=; b=hQbO++C1vj25Nt88ZKIAuUttja2dJi7ejpT72AFgBnLKGWajfXZGvizNGw2vuAZyTJ nPmT/Fg8PK+VLuXuHTC6oOSd8K04qmvJnHl4khD9Osmi4BhfB2flJUfMHaZ/3gfaGF0S TpAGEg2/3b91CVEreYkwk8dqpqj3jjje6VnK+/otmMfXUphi4SMX7BKRS/ru/oP7BTab u11zm6prlZ3cTassf4Khltk7UGR68tNg8A8DeFIqXCPylcgKMUiDlRwzt9/GcD2H/k7C HVxMx0+RgdfM3cL8zCGlNRNYgUdXwl/JLJKHr4As2ras5qxYz3CXlB4+qpifKbiTU3NT GUTw== Received: by 10.52.72.164 with SMTP id e4mr5430174vdv.103.1346078282890; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 07:38:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: laruence@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.18.15 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 07:37:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <503A6003.5030806@sugarcrm.com> References: <503A6003.5030806@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:37:42 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: K5qvgt9xIpgv_UhDcaHHRum0ZuY Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE]Call for voting: support use list in foreach From: laruence@php.net (Laruence) Hi: sorry to replying top. this is really a minor features, so few people are interesting in this. thus fewer people will vote for it. if people interesting in the RFC, he will vote. so I think it's okey.. thanks On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > >> foreach supports list syntax: 11 for yes, 4 for no. accepted. >> foreach supports list with silent token: 2 for yes, 10 for no. denied. > > And here's again the problem with this voting setup. With all these long > discussions about people not getting votes we have 15 people that > bothered to vote at all, and essentially the vote is decided by one or > two single votes, and the vote doesn't even have to be from a PHP > contributor - but the vote of anybody who can register on PHP wiki is > enough to decide questions on the core of the language. And I'm not > talking about "the voice of the masses" there but by a single vote of > anybody who bothers to vote, which 99% of people just do not. > > I do not this it is a healthy state of things. Sorry to raise the topic > that was discussed 1000 times before, but the situation does not seem to > improve. > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ > (408)454-6900 ext. 227 -- Laruence Xinchen Hui http://www.laruence.com/