Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:62538 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 72630 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2012 21:35:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Aug 2012 21:35:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.173 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.173 smtp173.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.173] ([67.192.241.173:60625] helo=smtp173.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9E/1E-00843-F869A305 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:35:11 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp17.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id EAE4E1882C8; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:35:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp17.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 6E4B9188296; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:35:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <503A968A.4070206@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:35:06 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yasuo Ohgaki CC: Sherif Ramadan , PHP Internals References: <50364644.1060302@lerdorf.com> <5039D249.30707@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Session Id Collisions From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > It seems I've already added collision detection when I > last updated :) > > It tries to generate new session ID a few times and > if it fails, it does not initialize session. It'd be nice if we could keep it separate. Could you create a pull that includes only the strict session functionality? You could add the collision part in separate pull and we could discuss it separately but it'd be nice to not mix these things. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227